Victim of Romanian Political Persecution Alexander Adamescu Retains Lawyer Robert Amsterdam

Alexander Adamescu
Alexander Adamescu

Alexander Adamescu was arrested in London on 13 June 2016 before he was due to speak at a conference on the abuses of Eastern European countries of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). Romania issued precisely such an EAW against Alexander Adamescu after being informed of his presence at the conference. Alexander Adamescu, who lives in London with his partner and three small children since 2012 and works as a playwright, denies all allegations raised by Romania’s National Anticorruption Directorate (DNA).

The son of the well-known Romanian businessman Dan Adamescu has engaged the international lawyer Robert Amsterdam to fight back against the politically motivated persecution by the government of Romania.

“Romania’s persecution of Mr. Adamescu represents an egregious example of the abuse of state power by private interests, driven by motivations that have nothing to do with rule of law, anti-corruption and more to do with suppressing freedom of expression,” said Mr. Amsterdam, who in the past has represented political prisoners such as Russia’s Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

“It is very interesting that the DNA completely ignored any involvement of Alexander Adamescu in this case until Romania was slapped with an £500 million arbitration claim for the destruction of a group of companies controlled by Mr. Adamescu, TNG- The Nova Group, which include Romania’s liberal newspaper România Liberă and one of Romania’s largest insurance companies Astra Asigurari. As a reaction to the arbitration, it appears as though the DNA is attempting to apply pressure against Dan Adamescu with mafia-like tactics.”

Amsterdam says that he sees many parallels between Romania’s resurgent prosecutorial state and the recent abuses by the current Russian government.

“There is not only a clear economic motivation for the DNA to persecute this family and take away their businesses, but also a reprehensible attack on freedom of expression, as certain individuals within the Romanian government have sought to destroy the newspaper România Liberă by going after its financiers.”

Amsterdam believes that the United States and Germany have been fooled by the Romanian government into believing this is a positive step for anti-corruption prevention in Romania. This is clouded by the involvement of firm KPMG.

“The Romanian state – through its professional-pawn KPMG, has deliberately mislead the United Kingdom and Germany by pretending this is about anti-corruption. A closer examination would reveal a Romanian elite scared of a newspaper serving only to hold the Romanian government accountable”.

Amsterdam, the founding partner of Amsterdam & Partners LLP, says that Alexander Adamescu is exploring a number of international legal avenues to shine a light on the corrupt practices of the Romanian prosecutors in this case, which have a negative impact on the country’s overall environment for rule of law.

Amsterdam & Partners LLP is an international law firm with offices in London and Washington DC. More information about this case can be found on robertamsterdam.com.

Why the European Arrest Warrant is not good for the UK – the case of Alexander Adamescu

Why the European Arrest Warrant is not good for the UK – the case of Alexander Adamescu
Alexander Adamescu

Alexander Adamescu is a 38 year old successful businessman. He is a German citizen, now residing in London with his wife and two young children where he studies at the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama.

On June 13th 2016, while on his way to making a speech at The Frontline Club in London, Alexander Adamescu was arrested by the Metropolitan Police and taken into custody, using the powers of the European Arrest Warrant.

The European Arrest Warrant (EAW) is law in all 28 member states of the European Union (EU). By removing the political and administrative phases of individual states, it allows for the arrest and unquestioned extradition of a named criminal suspect or sentenced individual from one member state to another.

The arrest in London of Alexander Adamescu followed investigations in March 2016 by prosecutors of the National Anti-corruption Directorate (DNA) in Romania who accused him of two counts of bribery. Alexander Adamescu is the son of wealthy Romanian businessman Dan Adamescu, owner of the largest insurance company in Romania, Astra Asigurari, and an outspoken critic of the left-wing Romanian government.

Advocates of human rights and commentators from both the left and right of UK politics, such as Peter Oborne (Daily Mail), Damien Phillips (Conservative Home) and Stephen Pollard (The Spectator) have all argued that the Romanian government’s case against Alexander Adamescu is flawed and politically motivated. Furthermore, that the British police shouldn’t be forced into the unenviable position of arresting a German citizen living in London on the pretence of the European Arrest Warrant, which obliges member states of the European Union (EU) to blindly carry out arrests on the orders a foreign government.

A spokesperson defending the case against Alexander Adamescu believes he is the victim of his father’s criticism and actions against the Romanian government. Dan Adamescu is now serving a prison sentence in Romania on corruption charges.

Below is a video of the European Arrest Warrant Event at the Frontline Club in London. The video starts by showing the arrest scene and of the event that followed. Panelists include Eeva Heikkila, Adriana Adamescu (Alexander Adamescu’s wife), Radu Moraru, Neil Barnett and Peter Oborne. Joseph Sternberg was the moderator.

I can see how the borderless European Arrest Warrant system looks great on paper, allowing for states to work together against corruption and crime. But in practise, the case of Alexander Adamescu surely underlines serious weaknesses. Personally, I have no idea if the allegations against him are true or fabricated. But what doesn’t seem right is to arrest a German citizen residing in London with an arrest warrant made by a Romanian court for his extradition in what appears to be suspicious circumstances. The UK takes pride in its judiciary system; and ‘innocent until proven guilty’ is something to be proud of.

The UK government needs to consider its continued involvement and support of the European Arrest Warrant system and make a stand against this indefensible EU law.

Are you happy with your current business phones?

Business PhonesWhile telecommunication and electronics companies continue to flood the market with new business phones and PBX systems each year,  many companies are not willing to upgrade and more than happy to go without the latest bells and whistles.

Some new products come with big money promotions.  Some include the latest technology, faster speeds and more security.  While others offer nothing more than a new advertising campaign.

So why would you want to upgrade your business phones to a new, more expensive solution, if the ones you have are trustworthy, reliable and in good working order?

MF Communications provide new and remanufactured phones that are no longer sold or supported by the manufacturer to companies in the UK & all over the world.  The term given to such phones is MD (manufacturer discontinued). The Siemens Optipoint range is a good example.  The Optipoint 500 range includes five very popular business phones.  The Siemens Optipoint range replaced the Optiset range over 10 years ago, and has since been superseded by the Openstage range.

The Siemens Optipoint 500 telephones are a range of digital phones that are compatible with Siemens Hipath 3000 and HiPath 4000 systems and Siemens Hicom 150H and 300H. The Siemens Optipoint 500 range includes:

Optipoint 500 Entry – an entry-level, non-display, multi line business phone with eight programmable feature keys

Optipoint 500 Economy – an easy to use, display screen, multi line business phone with twelve programmable feature keys

Optipoint 500 Basic – a basic model with display screen and twelve programmable feature keys

Optipoint 500 Standard – display screen model with twelve programmable feature keys and full duplex speaker phone

Optipoint 500 Advance – backlit display screen model, with nineteen programmable feature keys (each allowing two functions), plus full duplex speaker phone

MF Communications sell a full range of Siemens Optipoint 500 business phones and spare parts, and a wide range of legacy business telephones and PBX spare parts warehouse.  The UK-based company provide a full 1 year warranty with all their new, remanufactured and refurbished phones and parts.

For more information on the business phones MF Communications provide and sell to companies worldwide, visit www.mfcomm.co.uk/business-phones.

What can you do to ensure you enjoy online gambling?

The Internet is awash with online gambling sites. Websites offering a quick punt on the 3:10 at Chepstow or United to beat City to customers who want to play slot machines and bingo or visit a casino without having to leave their homes to do so.

The reason this market never appears to be fully saturated is because of the law of supply and demand.  The offer of a free bet, game or roll of the dice is enough to entice new players on a daily basis.  As long as everyone remembers, there is only one winner when it comes to who makes the most profit.

Of course, gambling can be highly addictive and in turn cause upset and destroy lives, not only to the person willing to gamble more than they can afford to lose, but to those affected by the stress, ill-health and debt that can be a result of an addiction. In recent years there has been a stronger focus on how gambling can lead to addiction and should be treated as an illness, rather than frowned upon and seen as nothing more than irresponsible behaviour.  This social awareness has been helped by marketing campaigns such as Gamble Aware and organisations promoting a message to their customers to gamble responsibly.

So what can you do to ensure you gamble responsibly?

Firstly, you should always be aware of what you can afford to lose.  Never overburden the outcome of a bet or trip to an online casino by chasing a lost bet or betting because you need to make a quick buck.  Knowing what you can afford to lose, and then losing it, should be a ‘worst case scenario’.  Any other result should bring a smile to your face.

It’s easy to get excited by a winning streak or depressed and stressed following a losing bet, especially when it appeared to be the best tip you’ve ever had!  Good advice is to set out with an amount in mind before you even fire up the website.

Secondly, with so many websites to choose from, it is imperative that you can trust the site you are about to give up your bank details to.  If it’s not a well known brand, undertake some research and be confident this website is backed by a legitimate company.  Don’t worry, there are thousands to choose from, such as bestcasino.co.uk.

Thirdly, always know when to quit.  Whether you are winning or losing, the rollercoaster ride is part of the fun.  The excitement and the adrenalin rush is breath-taking.  But equally, the lows can feel like an empty, bottomless pit.

The positives of what online gambling and the Internet has brought us is more freedom and personal choice.  The ease and speed of which someone can now place a bet has rightly drawn attention to the downside of gambling.  But gamble responsibly and within your means, and you can experience excitement and fun without ever having to open your front door, again.

Brake, the road safety charity, has expressed disappointment with the Department for Transport’s newly-published ‘Road Safety Statement’

Brake, the road safety charityBrake, the road safety charity, has expressed disappointment with the Department for Transport’s newly-published ‘Road Safety Statement’ (replacing its previous Road Safety Strategy). Despite calls by Brake and across the road safety sector for stronger leadership from government on preventing devastating road death and injuries following a recent increase in casualties, the Statement fails to include casualty reduction targets or a ‘vision zero’, which would make clear that the ultimate goal is to reduce deaths to zero. International evidence indicates that targets help to spur progress in road safety , and increasing governments and authorities (including Sweden, Scotland and London) are adopting vision zero approaches.

According to the DfT’s Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain Annual Report for 2014 the number of people killed on our roads rose by 4% last year to 1,775, while those seriously injured rose by 5% to 22,807 people. Overall casualties rose by 6%, interrupting what was a steady downward trend since 1997. As national provider of support to bereaved and seriously injured road crash victims (through a helpline and support packs part-funded by the Ministry of Justice), Brake is acutely aware of the terrible suffering caused by every casualty.

Alice Bailey, campaigns officer at Brake, says: “We know from our work supporting devastated road crash victims that every death and injury sends out shockwaves of pain and suffering. We also know from international research and experience that there is far more the government could and should do, to prevent these casualties and enable everyone to get around safely and sustainably. There is some important recognition in this Statement of what good practice in road safety looks like, and the fact that road safety is an issue central to public health and sustainability – and that by improving road safety we can make economic gains too. Yet we’re disappointed that the government has failed to include casualty reduction targets, an ambitious vision, or more decisive action on issues like young driver safety, pedestrian safety or drink driving, all of which remain desperately important.”

Brake welcomes some aspects of the Road Safety Statement, including the government’s recognition of the importance of a ‘safe systems’ approach. However, Brake believes the government could go much further in implementing evidenced policy to ensure senseless tragedies on our roads fall again, and everyone can get around safely, sustainably and healthily:

Walking and cycling – Brake welcomes the recognition that road safety is a public health and sustainability issue as well as being about casualty prevention, and the inclusion of protecting vulnerable road users as a priority. However Brake believes the government should do far more to ensure nationwide roll-out of traffic-free cycle paths, area-wide 20mph limits, and other measures to make roads more pedestrian and cyclist friendly. See Brake’s recent response to the government’s Walking and Cycling Investment Strategy and GO 20 campaign.

Mobile phones – Brake supports proposals for tougher penalties (four points and a £150 fine) for using mobile phones at the wheel of a car, but believes this does not go far enough, especially as many first time offenders will be offered educational courses instead. Brake recommends increasing fines to £1,000, to provide a stronger deterrent, and for hands free phones to be included under the ban, in line with research showing the dangers . See Brake’s Drive Smart campaign.

Young and novice drivers – Government plans to make improvements to driver learning and testing are not unwelcome, but research shows the introduction of a new system of Graduated Driver Licensing – long recommended by Brake and recognised as best practice globally – would be highly effective in reducing crashes among young and new drivers. It’s estimated it could prevent 400 deaths and serious injuries each year if implemented in the UK . See Brake’s campaign.

Drink and drug driving – Brake backs the provision of funding to support effective enforcement of the new drug driving law, but is concerned by the ongoing lack of action by Westminster to crack down on drink driving, which remains one of the biggest killers on our roads. Brake advocates a zero-tolerance drink drive limit to make clear it should be ‘none for the road’. See Brake’s not a drop, not a drag campaign.